What Good Is a Regression? Inference to the Best Explanation and the Practice of Political Science Research
The Journal of Politics 87(4): 1587-1599, 2025.

Abstract
We argue that almost all empirical social science research employs a mode of argumentation called "Inference to the Best Explanation" (IBE). While IBE is widely used, it is seldom explicated, leading to confusion about the role that evidence plays in social science claims. We describe what IBE is and its implications for the evaluation of studies of various types from quantitative description, to traditional regression studies, to work with modern causal identification. We contend that debates over the merits of these approaches should be understood as debates over the relative weight scholars place on quality of explanations, the quality of evidence and the bridge between the two. Seeing the process this way helps highlight the merits of different research traditions and explains common pathologies of the same. Informed by IBE, we clarify the motivation for certain advice in regression studies and offer guidance on best practice.
Related Publications
- [Paper] What Is Your Estimand? Defining the Target Quantity Connects Statistical Evidence to Theory
- [Paper] Measuring Distances in High-Dimensional Spaces: Why Average Group Vector Comparisons Exhibit Bias, and What to Do About It
- [Working Paper] Where's the Evidence that Respondents Understand Your Survey Questions?
- [Paper] Handle with Care: A Sociologist's Guide to Causal Inference with Instrumental Variables
- [Paper] Correcting the Measurement Errors of AI-Assisted Labeling in Image Analysis Using Design-Based Supervised Learning
- [Paper] Short-Term Exposure to "Filter-Bubble" Recommendation Systems Has Limited Polarization Effects: Naturalistic Experiments on YouTube
- [Paper] REFORMS: Consensus-Based Recommendations for Machine-Learning-Based Science
- [Paper] Naive Regression Requires Weaker Assumptions than Factor Models to Adjust for Multiple Cause Confounding