Use of Force and Civil-Military Relations in Russia: An Automated Content Analysis
Small Wars & Insurgencies 20(2): 319-343, 2009.

Abstract
Russia’s intervention in the Georgian–South Ossetian conflict has highlighted the need to rigorously examine trends in the public debate over the use of force in Russia. Approaching this debate through the prism of civil–military relations, we take advantage of recent methodological advances in automated content analysis and generate a new dataset of 8000 public statements made by Russia’s political and military leaders during the Putin period. The data show little evidence that military elites exert a restraining influence on Russian foreign and defence policy. Although more hesitant than their political counterparts to embrace an interventionist foreign policy agenda, Russian military elites are considerably more activist in considering the use of force as an instrument of foreign policy.
Related Publications
- [Other] Fair & Balanced or Fit to Print? The Effects of Media Sources on Statistical Inferences
- [Conference Proceedings] Learning to Extract International Relations from Political Context
- [Paper] Choosing Your Neighbors: Networks of Diffusion in International Relations
- [Working Paper] Where's the Evidence that Respondents Understand Your Survey Questions?
- [Paper] State Media Control Influences Large Language Models
- [Paper] Fine-Tuned Large Language Models Can Replicate Expert Coding Better Than Trained Coders: A Study on Informative Signals Sent by Interest Groups
- [Paper] The Decade-Long Growth of Government-Authored News Media in China under Xi Jinping
- [Paper] Short-Term Exposure to "Filter-Bubble" Recommendation Systems Has Limited Polarization Effects: Naturalistic Experiments on YouTube