Wrestling with Complexity in Computational Social Science: Theory, Estimation, and Representation
In The SAGE Handbook of Research Methods in Political Science and International Relations, SAGE, 2020.

Abstract
Social scientists are now in an era of data abundance, and machine learning tools are increasingly used to extract meaning from data sets both massive and small. We explain how the inclusion of machine learning in the social sciences requires us to rethink not only applications of machine learning methods but also best practices in the social sciences. In contrast to the traditional tasks for machine learning in computer science and statistics, when machine learning is applied to social scientific data, it is used to discover new concepts, measure the prevalence of those concepts, assess causal effects, and make predictions. The abundance of data and resources facilitates the move away from a deductive social science to a more sequential, interactive, and ultimately inductive approach to inference. We explain how an agnostic approach to machine learning methods focused on the social science tasks facilitates progress across a wide range of questions.
Related Publications
- [Paper] Short-Term Exposure to "Filter-Bubble" Recommendation Systems Has Limited Polarization Effects: Naturalistic Experiments on YouTube
- [Paper] REFORMS: Consensus-Based Recommendations for Machine-Learning-Based Science
- [Paper] Machine Learning for Social Science: An Agnostic Approach
- [Conference Proceedings] How Algorithmic Confounding in Recommendation Systems Increases Homogeneity and Decreases Utility
- [Paper] Measuring the Predictability of Life Outcomes with a Scientific Mass Collaboration
- [Conference Proceedings] EgoPolice: A Benchmark for Egocentric Video Understanding in High-Stakes Police Body-Worn Camera Footage
- [Working Paper] Where's the Evidence that Respondents Understand Your Survey Questions?
- [Paper] Handle with Care: A Sociologist's Guide to Causal Inference with Instrumental Variables